• scissors
    April 10th, 2010EthelCosta Rica, E-mail, Humor, Music, Technology
    Listen with webreader

    I hope everyone in the Playa Flamingo area is enjoying the great reggae music on 96.9 FM . . . I know I am.

    I was sent this photo and I had to share it with you:

    Viagra

    I forwarded it on to my Chinese doctor friend.

    He e-mailed back: “If light stay on for more than 4 hours, call your erectrician.”

    __________________________________________________________________________

    Join the EGF Costa Rica Community!

    EGF Costa Rica Community


    Check out these related blogs

    Did you know this: People in nudist colonies play volleyball more than any other sport. . . .Now you do!

    Tags: ,
  • scissors
    January 29th, 2010EthelCosta Rica, Current Affairs, E-mail, Travel
    Listen with webreader

    Haiti Earthquake

    The recent devastating earthquake in Haiti has raised concerns and questions in other earthquake-susceptible parts of the world: “What should we do to prepare for a potential earthquake?”; “If we do experience an earthquake, what should we do to reduce our chances or injury or death?”

    I don’t want to frighten anyone, especially potential visitors to the beautiful country of Costa Rica (the chances of being murdered or killed in a car accident in the United States are astronomically higher than the chances of being injured in an earthquake in Costa Rica).  However, that said, the reality is that Costa Rica is one of the most earthquake-prone countries in the world.

    Just off the west coast is the Middle America Trench, where a section of the seafloor called the Cocos Plate dives beneath Central America, generating powerful earthquakes and feeding a string of active volcanoes. This type of boundary between two converging plates of the Earth’s crust is called a subduction zone–and such zones are notorious for generating the most powerful and destructive earthquakes.

    Moon Costa Rica explains it as follows:

    Moon Costa Rica

    Costa Rica lies at the boundary where the Pacific’s Cocos Plate–a piece of the earth’s crust some 510 km wide–meets the crustal plate underlying the Caribbean. The two are converging as the Cocos Plate moves east at a rate of about 10 cm a year. It is a classic subduction zone in which the Caribbean Plate is forced under the Cocos–one of the most dynamic junctures on earth. Central America has been an isthmus, a peninsula, and even an archipelago in the not-so-distant geological past. It has therefore been both a corridor for and a barrier to landward movements, and it has been an area in which migrants have flourished, new life forms have emerged, and new ways of life have evolved. Yet a semblance of the Central America we know today became recognizable only in recent geological history. In fact, Costa Rica has one of the youngest surface areas in the Americas–only three million years old–for the volatile region has only recently been thrust from beneath the sea.

    In its travels eastward, the Cocos Plate gradually broke into seven fragments, which today move forward at varying depths and angles. This fracturing and competitive movement causes the frequent earthquakes with which Costa Ricans contend. The forces that thrust the Cocos and Caribbean Plates together continue to build inexorably.

    From insignificant tremors to catastrophic blockbusters, most earthquakes are caused by the slippage of masses of rock along earth fractures or faults. Rocks possess elastic properties, and in time this elasticity allows rocks to accumulate strain energy as tectonic plates or their component sections jostle each other. Friction can contain the strain and hold the rocks in place for years. But eventually, as with a rubber band stretched beyond its breaking point, strain overcomes frictional lock and the fault ruptures at its weakest point.

    Suddenly, the pent-up energy is released in the form of an earthquake–seismic waves that radiate in all directions from the point of rupture, the “focus.” This seismic activity can last for a fraction of a second to, for a major earthquake, several minutes. Pressure waves traveling at five miles per second race from the quake’s epicenter through the bedrock, compressing and extending the ground like an accordion. Following in their wake come waves that thrust the earth up and down, whipping along at three miles per second.

    For Costa Ricans, the bad news is that the most devastating earthquakes generally occur in subduction zones, when one tectonic plate plunges beneath another. Ocean trench quakes off the coast of Costa Rica have been recorded at 8.9 on the Richter scale and are among history’s most awesome, heaving the sea floor sometimes scores of feet. These ruptures often propagate upward, touching off other, lower-magnitude tremors. This is what happened when the powerful 7.4 quake struck Costa Rica on 22 April 1991. That massive quake, which originated near the Caribbean town of Pandora (112 km southeast of San José), left at least 27 people dead, more than 400 injured, 13,000 homeless, and more than 3,260 buildings destroyed in Limón Province. The earthquake caused the Atlantic coastline to rise permanently–in parts by as much as 1.5 meters. In consequence, many of the beaches are deeper, and coral reefs have been thrust above the ocean surface and reduced to bleached calcareous skeletons.

    Costa Rica Earthquake Map

    In 2009, “the Cinchona Earthquake” occurred at 1:21:34 pm local time (19:21:34 UTC) on January 8, 2009. The epicenter of the 6.1 Mw earthquake was in northern Costa Rica, 30 kilometres (19 mi) north-northwest of San José. The earthquake was felt all over Costa Rica as well as in southern central Nicaragua.

    The earthquake took at least 34 lives, including at least three children, left about 64 people missing, and injured at least 91. Hundreds of people were trapped and two villages had been cut off.  Most of the victims died when a landslide occurred near the La Paz waterfall by the Poás Volcano, and 452 people including 369 tourists were evacuated from the area in helicopters.  1,244 people were displaced, and 1,078 people are living in shelters.  In addition, a hotel, houses, roads, and vehicles were damaged, and several bridges were also destroyed.  The town of Cinchona was heavily hit, and all of the buildings there were heavily damaged. Power was temporarily disrupted in San José.

    (Read the rest of this post to see Episode 14 of Pilot Season).

    Read the rest of this entry »

    Did you know this: People in nudist colonies play volleyball more than any other sport. . . .Now you do!

    Tags: ,
  • scissors
    January 17th, 2010EthelCurrent Affairs, E-mail, Internet, Technology
    Listen with webreader

    SarcMark

    Michigan-based company Sarcasm Inc. has come up with the “SarcMark”, a symbol to denote sarcasm to help avoid confusion in typed messages. The SarcMark is a new punctuation mark, which resembles a sort of open circle with a dot in the center.  You can download it to your computer or BlackBerry for $1.99.

    In a press release, the company said:

    Statements have the period. Questions have the question mark. Exclamations have the exclamation mark. When you see the newest punctuation mark for sarcasm, you’ll know the writer of that sentence doesn’t literally mean what they’re writing; they’re being sarcastic.

    Although I admire Sarcasm Inc.’s entrepreneurial thinking (imagine if every computer or mobile phone user in the world paid the company $2.00 for the right to use the punctuation mark!), I have a couple of problems with the SarcMark:

    1.  The idea is hardly original. For example, back in August of 2001, a blog called Liloia.com proposed the use of the tilde (~) as a punctuation mark for a sarcastic comment:

    I have just invented a new form of punctuation. I know… it seems far-fetched, but really, inventing new forms of punctuation is not that hard. I’m filling a need here, just like Ron Popeil.

    Anyway… in print, there are question marks to indicate queries, exclamation marks to indicate emphasis and periods to indicate a statement, but nothing lets a reader know that a sentence is meant to be sarcastic.

    I am often online and I participate in several forms of written communication on the Internet like chats, bulletin boards and email. I’m sure that you do as well—since you’re here reading this. I’m also sure you’ve seen a joke or sarcastic remark taken the wrong way because the reader doesn’t regognize the author’s intent. Why do we let this continue to happen? Is this a question? Yes, it is. You knew because of the question mark.

    What I am proposing is a punctuation mark that clears up all confusion about sarcastic remarks for the reader. The closest thing to a sarcasm mark is the winking smiley—and he isn’t really a professional tool. You can’t write a missive to a business associate with little cutesy ASCII faces in it. It’s just not done.
    And no one can claim that sarcasm isn’t professional. If the amount of sarcasm in the American workplace is any indication, sarcasm is nothing but professional! My solution is the tilde. ~ We use it for practically nothing so it’s free for the taking. Sure, the Spaniards and Mexicans have an affinity for that little squiggly. And web hosting services like Tripod brought the tilde out of the obscure place where the-thing-above-the-6 lives and back into our vocabulary.

    What I propose is on a much grander scale. The sarcasm mark would be appended to the end of any sentence that was meant sarcastically. Think of all of the different places where the sarcasm mark is applicable! Why, The Onion alone would use hundreds of sarcasm marks each day. Man, the Onion is one great newspaper~ Did you catch that? It was a test sarcasm mark—it worked, didn’t it? You knew I was being sarcastic. I’m telling you, 10 years from now when the sarcasm mark is in the dictionary, you’ll thank me.

    . . . and, in December of 2004, Slate suggested the use of the “sarcasm point” (¡). The Slate article stated (sarcastically) as follow:

    The English language must evolve. Not with emoticons or lol or brb or l8r or GRATUITOUS all caps used for emphasis, not with Spanglish or bumbling Bushisms or even cryptic Kerryisms. We don’t need more quotation marks that “hedge” or try to make the same “old” thing sound “fresh.” What we need is an honest effort to incorporate the way we live today. My fellow Americans, we need to embrace a new punctuation mark—one that embraces the irony and edge of contemporary conversation and clarifies rather than condenses or confuses.

    It is time for the adoption of the sarcasm point. Why the sarcasm point? We have a mark that conveys that we mean or know something. We have one that says it with volume and force! We have one that communicates that we don’t know something, don’t we? We need one more: to do for language what shade did for drawing, what color did for television, and what eyebrows did for expressions—introduce finesse.

    The problem is simple. We live in a whiplash, light-speed world in which motion can range, within minutes, from standstill to supersonic, decibel levels range from NPR to Limbaugh, and the range of sincerity can shoot from earnest to irreverent in nanoseconds.

    Believe it or not, the world we’ve landed in is not only more image-obsessed than we’ve ever seen. It’s also more text-based than ever. We finger-type and we thumb-type. We e-mail, we IM, we blog. And the forms cannot contain the content. There’s a dastardly disconnect. Among other things, it makes Dave Barry columns somewhat difficult to read. Someone must step into the sarcasm chasm¡

    I’m serious¡ See, there are people who are relentlessly sincere. So, what are they supposed to do when they’re trying to sound a bit bitter? Suppose you’re IM’ing that oft-earnest friend you have, and he writes: “I need to go to church tomorrow and confess the jealousy in my heart.” You forget—have you ever heard him say nice things about God or do the opposite? “Wait … do you really?” “Sorry. I mean, I need to go to church tomorrow¡ To confess my jealousy¡ And the fact that I just renewed my subscription to Maxim¡” “Oh. Me too. Only as a Jew, I must do these things in synagogue¡”

    And then there are people who are relentlessly sarcastic. How do we know when they’re being straight? The other day my brother told me he respected Colin Powell. I had no idea what he was trying to say.

    The sarcasm point can strengthen our communities and unite our broader culture¡

    Sarcasm purists, Norm McDonald, and his acolytes might be troubled by all this talk. Good sarcasm, they’ll tell you, is cueless. It trips dishonestly off the tongue. “What I’m looking forward to in prison is the prospect of anal rape.” Telegraph your insincerity and the thrill is gone. Announce it and your friends won’t experience the same delight in the spasm of sarcasm you use to praise the president.

    The other day I told my girlfriend I loved her. I did it on Yahoo! Instant Messenger. And the sarcasm just didn’t come across.

    I grant that blue states will be at the vanguards in anointing the new sarcasm point. We’ll use it in our MoveOn action alerts. We’ll teach it our public schools, in those grammar classes they fail to teach. We will type it with excitable hands in Bruckheimer scripts and lace it in our advertising.

    Red states will be slower to come along, perhaps. The first sarcasm point won’t work its way into the Republican Party platform until 2028, into a Georgia English textbook until 2032, and won’t appear in a prayer book until, I’m guessing, 2080. But the spread will be inevitable, kind of like civil unions.

    Williams Safire and F. Buckley, chiefs of the language police, are retiring not two moments too soon. Let the organized grammatical crime commence¡

    Do yourself a favor. Begin today. Suck in and cough out this little virus of an idea. Beam the meme. Use it at weddings, bar mitzvahs, and funerals¡ Try to keep it under wraps at gay coming out parties.

    I mean it¡

    And since I’m going to copyright this bugger, you’ll have to type¡© But don’t worry. You can take the copyright symbol ironically.

    Further, true computer geeks and html coders have been using “sarcasm tags” for years.  Different forms of tags are used, but here is an example to give you the idea:

    <sarcasm> The SarcMark is a brilliant idea </sarcasm>

    Other people have long been enclosing sarcastic remarks in asterisks (*) or using “emoticons”, such as

    :-)

    or ;-)

    or :-!

    or :P

    or ¬_¬ to suggest that the preceding comment was intended to be sarcastic.

    Oh, and the alternatives to the SarcMark are free.

    2. Confusion. Unless the SarcMark really takes off and everyone in the world recognizes it, *which I’m sure will happen*:-), you will be forced to explain to everyone who reads your e-mail or blog post what that strange symbol at the end of your sentence means.

    3. Do we really need it? If people reading my blog or e-mail are too dense to recognize sarcasm when they see it, then I can’t be bothered to point it out to them by adding a SarcMark.  I agree that good sarcasm is cueless and trips dishonestly off the tongue.

    If you disagree, please write a comment to me.

    ___________________________________________________________________________________

    Here’s Episode 12 of Pilot Season, entitled “Jail Time”:

    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
    Did you know this: People in nudist colonies play volleyball more than any other sport. . . .Now you do!

    Tags: ,
  • Why?

    3
    scissors
    May 3rd, 2009EthelCurrent Affairs, E-mail
    Listen with webreader

    Can someone explain this to me?  How could anyone get their jollies by sending out a hoax “Amber Alert”?

    Today, I received an e-mail entitled “Amber Alert”, informing me that a 13-year-old girl named Ashley Flores had been missing for two weeks.  You may have received it, as well.

     

    "Ashley Flores"

    "Ashley Flores"

    The e-mail suggested that if I saw Amber, or had any helpful information, I was to contact:

    Staff Sergeant Rick Williams
        Rolla Police Department
        1007 N. Elm St .
        Rolla ,   Mo.  65401
        (573) 364-1213
        Fax (573) 364-6346

    The e-mail then had a heart-wrenching plea from “Ashley’s” mother:

    “. . . Please pass this to everyone in your address book. With GOD on her side she will be found. I am asking you all, begging you to please forward this email on to anyone and everyone you know, PLEASE. It is still not too late. . .”.

    The “mother” invited readers to contact her at HelpFindAshleyFlores@yahoo.com.

    I thereupon spent a considerable amount of time writing the “Amber Alert” into a blog that could be desseminated to my thousands of readers, as well as my followers on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, Friendster, etc., etc.

    I even composed an e-mail to the unfortunate “mother”, passing on my sympathy and asking her to keep me informed as to the status of the search for her daughter.

    However, before I published the post or sent the e-mail, I decided that I’d better “practice what I preach”.  I always tell people to go to sites like Snopes.com or Hoaxbusters.org and check out the legitimacy of suspect e-mails before wasting other peoples time by passing them on.

    Sure, enough, Snopes.com reports that the purported “Amber Alert” concerning “Ashley Flores” is a hoax.  Apparently, there are different variations of the hoax – sometimes “Ashley” is missing from Rolla, Missouri; sometimes from Philadelphia; sometimes from Montreal.  The common element appears to be the “mother’s” yahoo.com e-mail address.  (Of course, e-mail sent to that address is returned, as there is “no such user”).

    This is what Snopes.com says about the “Ashley Flores” case:

    snopes Most missing child alerts circulated via e-mail fall into one of two categories: genuine reports of missing children that continue to be forwarded long after the child has been found, or hoaxes imploring readers to look for children who aren’t missing or don’t exist.  The above-quoted message bore all the hallmarks of the latter category.

     The text of the e-mail (reproduced as we first received it in May 2006) did not include some of the most basic information one would expect to find in a genuine missing child plea: where the young girl (Ashley Flores) went missing, when she went missing, when and where she was last seen, a physical description of her, contact information for her parents, contact information for the local police authorities handling the case, etc.  All that was provided was the ambiguous statement that a “Deli manager from Philadelphia, Pa” had a 13-year-old daughter who had been missing “for two weeks,” and even that information seemed to have been tacked on to the message by someone other than its originator. It even included phrases taken word-for-word from previous missing child hoax e-mails,such as Christopher John and Kelsey Brooke.

     Meanwhile, the one piece of identifying information provided in the message, a yahoo.com e-mail address, produced a “no such user” error when mail was sent to it, and a variety of searches through news accounts and law enforcement and missing child web sites, including the site of the Center for Missing & Exploited Children, failed to turn up any mention of a missing girl named “Ashley Flores.”  

    In the event, it turned out that although the pictured Ashley Flores might have been a real girl, her “missing” status was one concocted as a kids’ prank.  In this case it was a particularly bad and widespread prank, one that left thousands and thousands of concerned citizens attempting to verify the status of a missing girl who wasn’t really missing, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer:

    “Everyone is concerned about this girl,” said Athena Ware, spokesperson for the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. “We’ve gotten quite a few of those e-mails here. But it’s not an active case in our system.”

    It’s not an active case because it isn’t true.

    It’s a hoax; pure balderdash, sheer hornswoggle, a regular mountain of malarkey.

    There may indeed be an Ashley Flores living in Philadelphia, but nobody has reported her missing to the Philadelphia Police, said Yolanda Dawkins, a department spokesperson.

    The FBI hasn’t received any notice about young Ashley, either. Neither has the Pennsylvania and New Jersey State Police for that matter.

    An Acme spokesperson said that the market had received numerous inquiries and offers of help, but knew of no employee named Flores who had a missing daughter.

    In one day alone (19 May 2006), our site registered over 25,000 searches from readers looking for information about Ashley Flores.

    In April 2007, a version appearing over the signature of Staff Sergeant Rick Williams of the Rolla (Missouri) Police Department began hitting inboxes. While there is indeed a staff sergeant named Rick Williams working for that particular law enforcement agency, the hoax is just as much a hoax as ever. Says the Rolla Police Department: 

    Ashley Flores Missing Child Hoax

    Initial reports in the media and on the Internet of the missing 13-year-old Philadelphia girl named Ashley Flores have proven to be nothing more than a very bad hoax, according to numerous law enforcement agencies and credible news outlets.

     Despite conclusive evidence that the original missing person report and Amber Alert regarding Ashely Flores was a hoax concocted by a kid’s prank, the Rolla Police Department still receives hundreds of calls every day regarding her status.

     A variety of searches through law enforcement agencies, including the Federal Bureau of Investigations, New Jersey State Police and Philadelphia Police, and numerous missing child websites such as The Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), confirms there has never been an official report of a missing girl named Ashley Flores.

     The Rolla Police Department is trying to spread the word that although Ashley Flores may exist, reports of her disappearance were an unfortunate internet hoax. Pranks such as these are not only illegal, but also hamper and interfere with communications and law enforcement operations.

     For more information, please go here or call Lt. Doug James at 573-364-1213.

     In October 2008, we encountered a version of the e-mail that had been translated into French and which positioned the “missing” girl as having been taken from the Montreal area.

    Again, I ask . . . What twisted mind gets pleasure out of circulating phony missing children alerts?

    Amber Alerts are a great idea . . . and blogs and social media are a great way to quickly spread the world; however, if we get many phony Amber Alerts, they may suffer from the “boy who cried wolf” syndrome and just be ignored.

    The bottom line is that I encourage you to pass on Amber Alerts . . . but please check them out for authenticity before doing so.

     

    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
    Did you know this: People in nudist colonies play volleyball more than any other sport. . . .Now you do!

    Tags: ,
  • scissors
    April 27th, 2009EthelE-mail, Internet, Technology
    Listen with webreader

    pcworldI’m a big fan of PC World.  I subscribe to the digital version of the magazine (which, by the way, is the only practical way to subscribe to magazines if you live in Costa Rica) and I look forward to the PC World Weekly Brief in my e-mail in-box.  This week’s brief included a great article listing the top 26 Web hoaxes and pranks:

    These online spoofs and shams have made the rounds on Web sites and through e-mail. Perhaps you even believed one or two of them yourself.

    Steve Bass

    Thursday, May 03, 2007 01:00 AM PDT

    Whether they take the form of a comic image of a giant cat or a desperate plea from a sick child, chain e-mail messages and Internet frauds are elements of the online landscape that we’ve all encountered. No topic is off limits: a medical warning, a promise of free money, or a believably (or shoddily) Photoshopped image. But at the end of the day, they’re just elaborate hoaxes or clever pranks–and we’ve collected 25 of the most infamous ones ever to have graced the Internet or our inboxes.

    Though some of these deceptions originated years ago, the originals–and dozens of variants–continue to make the rounds. If you keep a patient vigil over your e-mail, you too may eventually spot a message urging you to FORWARD THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW!!! And if you haven’t had enough when you finish reading this article, take a hoax test at the Museum of Hoaxes, and then hop over to Snopes, the premier myth-dispelling site for coverage of zillions of other falsifications.

    1. The Accidental Tourist (2001)

    Wrong plane, wrong tower, nice posture.

    Quite possibly the most famous hoax picture ever, this gruesome idea of a joke traveled around the Web and made a grand tour of e-mail inboxes everywhere soon after the tragedy of September 11. It depicts a tourist standing on the observation deck of one of the World Trade Center towers, unknowingly posing for a picture as an American Airlines plane approaches in the background.

    At first glance it appears to be real, but if you examine certain details, you’ll see that it’s a craftily modified image. For starters, the plane that struck the WTC was a wide-body Boeing 767; the one in the picture is a smaller 757. The approach of the plane in the picture is from the north, yet the building it would have hit–the North tower–didn’t have an outdoor observation deck. Furthermore, the South tower’s outdoor deck didn’t open until 9:30 a.m. on weekdays, more than half an hour after the first plane struck the WTC. The picture is a hoax, through and through–and not a particularly amusing one, under the circumstances.

    Image courtesy of Snopes.com.

    2. Sick Kid Needs Your Help (1989)

    Proof that "Craig Sherwood" wasn't simply a creation of Hallmark's marketing department.

    This gem had its roots in reality. It all began in 1989, when nine-year-old cancer patient Craig Shergold thought of a way to achieve his dream of getting into the Guinness Book of World Records. Craig asked people to send greeting cards, and boy, did they. By 1991, 33 million greeting cards had been sent, far surpassing the prior record. Ironically, however, the Guinness World Records site doesn’t contain any mention of Craig Sherwood or a “most greeting cards received” record, presumably because the fine folks at the site don’t want to encourage anyone to try to break his mark. (Astonishingly, Guinness doesn’t have an entry for world’s stoutest person, either, but it does honor the World’s Largest Tankard of Beer.)

    Fortunately, doctors succeeded in removing the tumor, and Craig is now a healthy adult, but his appeal for cards has turned into the hoax that won’t die. Variations on the theme include a sick girl dying of cancer, and a little boy with leukemia whose dying wish is to start an eternal chain letter. A recent iteration tells a tragic tale of a girl who supposedly was horribly burned in a fire at WalMart, and then claims that AOL will pay all of her medical bills if only if you forward this e-mail to EVERYONE YOU KNOW!!! Okay, enough already.

    Image courtesy of Snopes.com.

    3. Bill Gates Money Giveaway (1997)

    No, it’s true. I thought it was a scam, but it happened to a buddy of mine. It seems that Microsoft is testing some new program for tracing e-mail, and the company needs volunteers to help try the thing out. He forwarded me an e-mail that he received from Microsoft–and get this, from Bill Gates himself! Two weeks later, as a reward for participating, my pal received a check for thousands of dollars! Sure he did. Another version of this hoax claims that AOL’s tracking service is offering a cash reward. Tell you what–when you get your check, send me 10 percent as a finder’s fee, okay?

    4. Five-Cent E-Mail Tax (1999)

    “Dear Internet Subscriber,” the e-mail starts. “The Government of the United States is quietly pushing through legislation that will affect your use of the Internet.” It goes on to reveal that “Bill 602P” will authorize the U.S. Postal Service to assess a charge of five cents for every e-mail sent. Not a bad way to cut down on the number of dopey e-mail chain letters and lame jokes people let loose on the world. But credulous curse averters and connoisseurs of boffo laffs can relax: This e-mail alert, which popped up in 1999 and comes back for a visit every year or so, just isn’t true. Still, it sounded plausible enough to fool Hillary Clinton during a 2000 debate when she was running for the Senate.

    5. Nigerian 419 E-Mail Scam (2000)

    “DEAR SIR,” the e-mail starts. “FIRSTLY I MUST FIRST SOLICIT YOUR CONFIDENCE IN THIS TRANSACTION; LET ME START BY INTRODUCING MYSELF PROPERLY…” I’m sure you’ve received one of these–a confidential, urgent e-mail message promising you a reward of mucho dinero for helping this person convey money abroad. All you need do in return is entrust your name and bank account number to the government bureaucrat (or his uncle, aunt, or cousin, the ostensible “credit officer with the union bank of Nigeria plc (uba) Benin branch”) who needs your help.

    It’s the Nigerian con, also known as an Advanced Fee Fraud or 419 scam (so called because of the section number of the Nigerian criminal code that applies to it). Ancestors of these scams appeared in the 1980s, when the media of choice were letters or faxes–and they’re still wildly successful at snagging people. In fact, Oprah recently featured a victim of the Nigerian scam on her show. And if you think that smart, educated folks couldn’t possibly fall for it, you’ll be surprised when you read ” The Perfect Mark,” a New Yorker magazine article profiling a Massachusetts psychotherapist who was duped–and lost a fortune.

    To see how the hoax works, visit Scamorama, a fascinating site that features a progression of e-mail messages stringing along 419 scammers, sometimes for months at a time. Finally, check out the 3rd Annual Nigerian E-Mail Conference, an absolutely perfect spoof.

    6. It’s Kidney Harvesting Time (1996)

    The subject line is laden with exclamation points: “Travelers Beware!!!” If that’s not enough to get your attention, the chilling story certainly will. The message warns that an organ-harvesting crime ring is drugging tourists in New Orleans and Las Vegas, snatching their “extra” kidneys, selling the organs to non-Hippocratic hospitals, and leaving the victims to wake up in a bathtub full of ice and find a brief note that explains the situation and conveniently identifies the phone number of the nearest emergency room. Hey, maybe they’ll get lucky and the hospital will have a compatible replacement kidney on hand. But travelers, fear not!!! According to the National Kidney Foundation, this scenario has never actually occurred–though it does have the makings of a great horror flick. (Freddy’s Last Harvest, anyone?)

    7. You’ve Got Virus! (1999 and on)

    There’s isn’t a Teddy Bear virus. Nor is there a sulfnbk.exe or A Virtual Card for You (“the “WORST VIRUS EVER!!!…CNN ANNOUNCED IT. PLEASE SEND THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW!!!”).

    The jdbgmgr.exe hoax (also known as Teddy Bear because the jdbgmgr.exe file is represented by a teddy bear icon) warned recipients of the e-mail message that they were at risk of infection from a virus sent via address books or Microsoft Messenger, and that they should delete the file immediately. But in reality there was no virus–and unfortunately, jdbgmgr.exe was a necessary Java file. The sulfnbk.exe hoax nailed even advanced users with its insistence that the file–a legit one that’s used for fixing long file names–was a virus. Lots of people removed it.

    Similarly, A Virtual Card for You claimed that McAfee had discovered a virus that, when opened, would destroy the hard drive on an infected system and would automatically send itself to everyone on the user’s e-mail contacts list. Of course, it didn’t do anything except scare people. So before you forward an e-mail virus warning to anyone (especially to me), look it up on Sophos or Vmyths to make sure it isn’t a fraud.

    8. Microsoft Buys Firefox (2006)

    Microsoft Firefox 2007 Pro: Closed-source and better than ever!

    Talk about scaring the entire open-source community. In October 2006, a previously unknown Web site popped up, announcing Microsoft’s acquisition of Firefox and promoting the company’s new Microsoft Firefox 2007 Professional. The site talks glowingly about the browser’s new features and provides a video advertisement for the product. It was a great prank, and the image of the Microsoft Firefox 2007 box was so elaborate and professional looking that the blood pressure of real Firefox users went sky-high.

    9. The Really Big Kitty (2001)

    How many half-lives does an atomic cat have?

    There are big cats and then there are even bigger cats. This one, reportedly tipping the scales at almost 90 pounds, was enormous. The claim seemed plausible and even snookered a lot of e-mail cynics (I’m raising my hand)–until they read the accompanying copy, that is. With nonsense about the owner working at Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, and more balderdash about nuclear reactors, the jig was up. Eventually, the cat’s owner fessed up to a creative Photoshop session, though he claimed that he never expected anyone to believe the photo was real.

    Image courtesy of Snopes.com.

    10. $250 Cookie Recipe (1996)

    The woman loved the cookie she had just nibbled at a Neiman Marcus cafe in Houston, so she asked her waiter for the recipe. “Two-fifty,” he said, and she agreed without hesitation, instructing him to add it to her tab. But when the woman’s Visa bill arrived, it read $250, instead of $2.50. Bent on revenge, she proceeded to ask you to blast the recipe to–okay, ready?–EVERYONE YOU KNOW!!! Like many hoaxes, this one predated the Internet, only to resurface in the electronic age. It appeared in a cookbook in the late 1940s as the $25 fudge cake, popped up in the 1960s as the Waldorf-Astoria red-velvet cake recipe, and re-emerged in the 1970s as the Mrs. Fields cookie recipe.

    11. Free Vacation Courtesy of Disney (1998)

    Dear Goofy… Forward this e-mail chain letter to everybody under the sun and, once 13,000 people have received it, Walt Disney Jr. will send five grand each to 1,300 lucky people on this list. And “the rest will recieve a free trip for two to Disney for one week during the summer of 1999.” Is that Disney World, Disneyland–or Walt’s house? The “Jr.” after Disney, in reference to a nonexistent person, ought to have been the first clue that this was a hoax. And the misspelling of “receive” was the clincher (remember, hoaxters, “i” before “e” except after “c”). Yet people forwarded the message around the world using the time-honored e-mail chain letter adage: I’m sending it to you… just in case it’s true.

    12. Sunset Over Africa (2003)

    The lamps are going on all over Europe--but in England it's sunny.

    Now that’s a dazzling photo of Africa and Europe, taken right around sunset from the Space Shuttle Columbia. What makes the image especially amazing is that, while London remains in daylight, night has fallen in Italy (a little to the southeast) and the bright lights of Rome, Naples, and Venice are blazing. Too bad it’s a digitally altered photo, most likely layered from multiple satellite images. To see an accurate, computer-generated illustration, check out the World Sunlight Map.

    Image courtesy of Snopes.com.

    13. Alien Autopsy at Roswell, New Mexico (1995)

    Roswell, New Mexico: ground zero of UFO controversy. It’s also where the movie of the Roswell alien autopsy was filmed 60 years ago. The story goes that a UFO crashed at this site, and the U.S. government performed a hush-hush autopsy on the dead alien. In the mid-1990s, unnamed individuals “discovered” the secret film and posted it for the edification of a disinformed public. Looks pretty real, right? Now fast-forward to 2006 and a conspiracy-deflating admission: The movie is a hoax created in 1995 by John Humphreys, the animator famous for Max Headroom, in his apartment in north London. …Or was it???

    14. Real-Time GPS Cell Phone Tracking (2007)

    Click for enlarged image.

    SunSat Satellite Solutions knows where you are.

    Have you heard about the Web site that can track the location of your cell phone in real time? It uses satellite GPS in combination with Google Maps, and it’s amazingly accurate (not to mention a disturbing invasion of privacy). Go ahead, check it out yourself by going to the SunSat Satellite Solutions site and tracking your own cell phone’s location. Select your country, type in your cell phone number, click the Start Searching button, and wait for it. (This is one of the year’s best pranks. And I won’t give away the ending.)

    15. Apollo Moon Landing Hoax (1969)

    If that's the moon, where's the green cheese?

    You’re aware that we never landed on the moon, right? It was all just an elaborate hoax designed to score Cold War points for the United States against the Soviet Union in a world of falling dominoes. The whole lunar landing thing? It was a video staged at movie studios and top-secret locations.

    Okay, you can stop laughing now, but some sites, such as Apollo Reality and Moon Landing, still insist that the Eagle never landed. Of course, enemies of Flat Earthism will point to the Rocket and Space Technology site, which does an in-depth job of debunking the hoax. But true disbelievers should check out this terrific video spoof, complete with outtakes showing lights and cameras.

    The world of weird eBay auction items starts off this page, which concludes with a photo hoax purporting to show a 1950s-era vision of the home computer of tomorrow.

    16. Sell It on eBay! (1995)

    You won’t believe what people have sold on eBay–some of the items pranks, some of them for real, and some, well, it’s hard to tell. For a sampling of the weird, you need look no further than a haunted tree stump and a pork chop shaped like a grizzly bear. The Internet itself once went on the market at a modest starting bid of a million bucks, as have a dozen spontaneous images of the Virgin Mary (on toast, on windows, and heaven only knows where else). Bidders have also had a shot at someone’s soul, a guy’s virginity, and a human kidney, with the price of this last item having reached $5.7 million before eBay pulled the plug. (Hey, guys, don’t you know that what you lose in Las Vegas is supposed to stay in Las Vegas?)

    But my favorite eBay offering involves a tattooed guy who, as a joke, dressed up in his ex-wife’s size 12 wedding gown and put it up for auction. Only, the dress ended up selling for $3850, and the guy got five marriage proposals. Nice.

    17. Chinese Newspaper Duped (2002)

    Schematic view of the proposed "modern facility" for Congress.

    Information on the Internet may want to be free–but if it’s posted by a for-profit publisher, you’d better take it with a grain of salt. That’s the lesson learned by China’s Beijing Evening News, which was taken in by the Onion’s Capitol Dome spoof. Famous for its authentic-sounding but tongue-in-cheek articles steeped in the language of the Associated Press, the Onion reported that Congress had threatened to leave Washington, D.C., and head for Memphis unless the District agreed to erect a new domed Capitol building with a retractable roof and luxury box seating. Having accepted most of the Onion article at face value, the Chinese newspaper at first stood by its source in the face of international derision and refused to back down. When it finally published a retraction, it blamed the Onion for the confusion: “Some small American newspapers frequently fabricate offbeat news to trick people into noticing them with the aim of making money.” Right.

    18. The Muppets Have Not Already Won (2001)

    Click for enlarged image.

    Osama and Bert: a Sesame Street connection to terrorism?

    In early October 2001, just prior to the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan, protesters at an anti-American rally in Bangladesh showed their support for Osama bin Laden by marching, chanting, and waving placards. One of the posters captured on film by Reuters News Agency was a photo-montage of the Al-Qaeda leader, and in one of the shots a yellow felt puppet to his right glowers furiously at the camera. It’s…Bert of Sesame Street. Originally a Zelig-inspired creation of San Francisco Webmaster Dino Ignacio, the satirical Web site Bert Is Evil depicted Bert hobnobbing with the worst of the worst in history, tormenting his roommate Ernie, and generally reveling in wickedness. After Ignacio retired from active efforts to expose Bert’s career of evil, others filled the Photoshop void, capturing the cone-headed miscreant with all the latest baddies-du-jour.

    Evidently, the company responsible for printing the pro-Osama poster found the doctored dual portrait irresistible, although (according to the Urban Legends References Pages) its production manager claims to have produced about 2000 copies of the Osama-and-Bert poster without realizing “what they signified.” Well, if you can’t trust pictures you find on the Internet, what can you trust?

    Image courtesy of Snopes.com.

    19. Chevrolet’s Not-So-Better Idea (2006)

    The ad folks at Chevrolet thought they had a winner: Let site visitors create their own 30-second commercial for the company’s 2007 Chevy Tahoe SUV. It’ll be fun, they probably thought. We’ll give them a choice of video clips and soundtracks, and let them add their own text captions. Yep, viral marketing at its best.

    Unfortunately for Chevrolet, a few pranksters decided to use the opportunity to express what they thought of the SUV. One commercial said, “Like this snowy wilderness? Better get your fill of it now. Then say hello to global warming.” Another lambasted the SUV as a gas guzzler: “Our planet’s oil is almost gone. You don’t need G.P.S. to see where this road leads.”

    20. Rand’s 1954 Home Computer (2004)

    This intriguing image of a room-size computer made the rounds of the Internet, accompanied by a breathless blurb: “This article is from an issue of 1954 ‘Popular Mechanics’ magazine forecasting the possibility of ‘home computers’ in 50 years.” The steering wheel in the picture is the predecessor to today’s mouse, and the keyboard looks like those on teletype machines. It even comes complete with a guy right out of the Eisenhower era.

    Cool stuff, and easy to believe–but it’s not a 1950s Rand Corporation mockup of what a prototype home computer might look like. It’s actually a shot that was taken of a submarine display at the Smithsonian Institution and subsequently modified for inclusion in a Fark.com image-manipulation competition.

    21. Microsoft Buys Catholic Church (1994)

    More than a decade ago, an e-mail press release–from Vatican City, no less–landed in my inbox. Microsoft was announcing that it was in the process of acquiring the Roman Catholic Church in exchange for an unspecified number of shares of Microsoft common stock. The story was a prank, but it sure looked real, circulating for months and perhaps worrying residents of the Holy See.

    Just think: If the press release had been true, it might have stopped the Vatican from using Linux. And no, I’m not kidding about the Linux part. Watch this video interview with the woman who helped build the Vatican’s Web site.

    22. Hercules, the Enormous Dog (2007)

    That dog won't hunt: "Hercules."

    Wow, that dog’s almost as big as the horse. That’s what I thought when I first looked at this e-mail. The picture depicts a couple, one walking a horse, the other holding the leash of Hercules, a 282-pound English Mastiff and “The World’s Biggest Dog Ever According to Guinness World Records.”

    Horsepucky. Here’s my analysis of the Photoshop modifications. First, take a close look at the grass under the people and the animals. The area has been subtly lightened in order to make all of the shadows match and look authentic. Next, examine the shadows and you’ll notice two anomalies: First, the shadows of the dog and the man start at their feet, but the same doesn’t hold true for the horse. Second, the woman’s shadow is missing altogether; instead, the man’s shadow extends in front of her. Oh and by the way, the Guinness World Records site doesn’t have a listing for Hercules or for the world’s biggest dog. Okay, okay, so the pictures of the big kitty and the big dog are both fakes–but have you seen the shot of Craig Sherwood riding the world’s largest jackelope?

    23. Lights-Out Gang Member Initiation (1998)

    People have a tendency to believe e-mail messages that come from authority figures. In 1998, a message purportedly from a police officer working with the DARE program circulated around the Internet. It warned recipients not to flash their lights to inform oncoming cars that their headlamps were off. According to the message, a recently devised gang initiation ritual involved having new gang members drive at night with their headlights turned off until an oncoming car flashed its lights at them; then, in order to become initiated, they were to shoot everyone in that car. It’s just another urban myth–and about as silly as the one claiming that gangs mark off their territory by hanging sneakers from power lines.

    24. Hurricane Lili Waterspouts (2002)

    Waterspouts in triplicate--must be Lili!

    It’s weird, it’s disturbing, and it’s seemingly plausible–all of the elements necessary for a successful e-mail forward. The image shows three dark waterspouts in the distance. The subject is “here comes lili,” and the e-mail began appearing in inboxes at about the same time that Hurricane Lili started battering the Louisiana coastline. But three waterspouts, all neatly lined up? According to About.com, the National Weather Service labeled the picture a hoax and said that it was a modification of a genuine photo taken in 2001 by a crew member of the Edison Chouest Offshore supply boat.

    25. Pranks Shut Down Los Angeles Times Wiki (2005)

    It seemed like a bright idea. The LA Times’ “A Wiki for Your Thoughts” fandango asked readers to chime in on the newspaper’s editorials via a Wiki. In their explanation of how it would work, the editors even acknowledged that “It sounds nutty.” Yet they went ahead with it–and achieved disastrous results. The Wikitorial (the name was nearly as dumb as the scheme) brought out the best and then the worst in readers. On the first day, an editorial about the war in Iraq prompted civil and thoughtful contributions. On day two, pranksters littered the unmoderated Wiki with rude comments, pornography, and profanity. The Webmaster removed the offending entries, but only after they were available for public viewing. By the next morning, the publisher had dismantled the Wiki.

    Tags: , , , , ,
  • scissors
    April 11th, 2009EthelE-mail, Internet, Technology
    Listen with webreader

    PCMag.com has published an excellent article, “25 Golden Rules of E-mail” – this should be reviewed by everyone who uses e-mail.

    pcmElectronic mail is older than tweets, blogs, SMS texts—older even than the entire Internet. Why is it so many people still don’t get it right?

    New users of all ages and experience levels hit the Net every day. They’re so new that even the most well-established netiquette can seem arcane and nonsensical to them. Especially when it comes to the killer app of all time: e-mail.

    We’ve put together this list of advice and tips that you can send to your favorite relative, your verbose coworker, and that former frat brother who’s found you on Facebook. It will teach them how best to get their missives to you in a way that won’t annoy you, won’t break the Internet, yet will get a timely, satisfactory response.

    1. Beware of hoaxes
    People have the best intentions when forwarding dire warnings about the latest computer virus, telemarketer con jobs, extreme gas prices, and whatever chicanery the current political administration is trying to pull. The problem: The vast majority of e-mail about such topics is utter fiction.

    We implore you: Whenever the opportunity strikes to pass on some juicy tale of woe that has hit your inbox, first visit Snopes.com. This is the Internet’s master repository of what is a hoax and what isn’t. Bookmark the site. Visit it and do a search. Whatever outrageous message you just received may, in fact, be only an urban legend. Other sites to check: The AFU & Urban Legends Archive and The Straight Dope.

    2. Don’t perpetuate pointlessness
    Here’s news you may not believe: Most people don’t necessarily share your sense of humor. Or your belief in chain letters that can cause bad luck involving your reproductive organs.

    Your friends and family are too polite to ask you to stop, and everyone else is far too busy dealing with important messages to want to wade through that nonsense. They all know to hit the delete key, but that doesn’t mean receiving these messages isn’t annoying.

    At the very least, give your recipients the option of not being subject to your forwards. You’ll be surprised how many people cheerfully say, “Hell, yes, take me off your list.”

    3. Get a permanent address
    There’s no such thing as a truly permanent and forever e-mail address. For most of the history of the Internet, people got e-mail addresses through either their Internet service provider or their employer. But few jobs or ISPs last forever, so that means changing your address, which means putting your friends through all the annoyance and hassle of updating their address books.

    You can minimize the chances of going through that change by utilizing an e-mail from a provider you believe will be around a while. Gmail, Yahoo, even Hotmail are all good bets—even AOL is still around, assuming you stuck with it.

    The only way to be sure your e-mail address is truly permanent is to control it. That means registering a domain name and buying e-mail service to go with it. If you want to be found by the same people forever, that’s the only way.

    4. Consolidate addresses
    Got a 15-year-old AOL account you don’t use? Have you signed up for every free Webmail in existence? Have a work address, ISP address, and maybe even one attached to your long-dead blog?

    It’s too much: Too many addresses for you to check, and worse, too much for your correspondents to keep track of. Narrow things down to only two addresses: one for newsletters, another for real people. You probably can’t get rid of your work e-mail address—just don’t give it to anyone outside of your industry. Delete your accounts with all the old services so that messages to them will bounce—but first, take a quick spin through those messages and be sure to inform anyone important to you about the change.

    5. Don’t hand out your address like candy
    Your e-mail address is a precious commodity, assuming you don’t want an inbox filled with spam, phishing schemes, and advertisements. Give it only to friends and coworkers. Eventually all addresses get spammed, but keeping it close will delay this for a while.

    Many online services want an e-mail address when you sign up. But you don’t necessarily want to receive e-mails from the service, much less spam from whomever they sell their mailing lists to. If you don’t have a spare account for that purpose, use a temporary e-mail service. Such services provide an address good for a limited time—just enough time to sign up—and then it goes away, never to bother you again. Mailinator, 10MinuteMail, and YopMail are all good choices.

    6. Do not use “Reply All” blindly
    We’ve all seen those messages come in: Some stray person who got the same company-wide e-mail you received hits Reply All, and now everyone in the company has to see his gripes. Don’t be that person. Especially don’t be that person if you’re going to gripe about someone in particular—it’s almost guaranteed that your subject will be on the list of people getting the message. Sadly, that kind of thing happens all the time.

    When sending a new message, don’t go to an old message and hit Reply All (or even Reply). Start from scratch and use your own address book. Otherwise someone you don’t intend may slip into the list.

    7. BCC is your friend
    CC once stood for “carbon copy.” Some say today it stands for “courtesy copy.” Either way, that’s how you send a message to someone else along with your intended recipient. However you interpret CC, the “B” stands for “blind,” and the BCC field is where you put in the names of those people you want to read your message on the sly. The people listed in the To and CC fields don’t get to see who’s included in the BCC field. Even the other recipients in BCC don’t see each other.

    It also serves another purpose. When sending a message to a very, very large list, always put all the addresses in BCC. That way recipients don’t have to wade through a gigantic list of names at the top of the message—and you’re not abusing everyone’s privacy by revealing their e-mail addresses.

    Better yet, no one has to suffer if one of those recipients pulls a Reply All snafu.

    8. Subject lines matter
    “Hi, how are you?” or “Check this out!” don’t cut it as subject lines when people are receiving hundreds of messages per day. If you can’t distill your message to five or six perfect, pithy words, you run the risk of not getting read at all.

    Don’t list that the message is from you in the subject, either. “Message from Eric” is redundant: The person knows it’s a message and can see your name in the From field. The subject should be on topic.

    And don’t bury the lead. If the message is about something important, state it up front, in the subject line. If you can inject a bit of urgency or a deadline (“Reply by midnight about CEO firing”) your message stands a much better chance of being read soon.

    If you leave the subject line blank, well… you don’t even deserve a reply.

    9. One topic per message
    We’re all a few steps away from A.D.D. these days, and tracking multiple topics in a message—and responding to them—is difficult at best. Even if you can electronically chew bubble gum and walk at the same time, sticking to a single subject makes it much easier to search and refer to past messages when necessary.

    10. Brevity is the soul of wit
    How often do you read e-mail messages that are over three paragraphs long?

    Neither does anyone else. ‘Nuff said.

    11. Send plain text if in doubt
    Most e-mail programs can display messages in rich text—with all the formatting and special characters and images you desire. Messages can be as complicated as any Web page, but not everyone appreciates that. In fact, since spammers can use images embedded in messages as Web bugs, many people turn off the ability for a message to display any HTML or rich text. That’s the default in some e-mail software.

    Unless you know for sure that a recipient wants to get formatted e-mail, the better choice is to send all messages as plain text.

    12. Run antivirus software
    There’s no excuse not to check every message you receive and send using e-mail software. Even free antivirus programs like AVG Free Edition can check every message you send and receive with Outlook or Thunderbird. Such scans of incoming and outgoing messages are a given with advanced AV tools. And we know you’re running some type of anti-malware on your computer all the time—right? Keep those definitions up to date.

    13. Avoid huge attachments
    Once, sending digital files to people was done only by e-mail. It was the only direct conduit available. Now, you have a wealth of options for sharing. As files get bigger and bigger, it’s best to take advantage of these options rather than clog up an inbox.

    First and best option: Share a link rather than the actual file. That video of your stealthy ninja kitten is huge coming from your DV camcorder; but if you put it on YouTube, you can simply send friends the link to view it online. Maybe it will go viral and make you an Internet superstar.

    If you absolutely must get the original file or media to someone, use drop.io, which lets you upload a file up to 100MB in size. The address to download it from is yours to distribute as you see fit (but eventually it will expire).

    At the very least, compress extra-large files before attaching them. That’s no longer as important in this age of broadband, but recipients with limited space for e-mail storage (even Gmail isn’t unlimited) or a restriction on attachment size (10MB is typical) will thank you.

    14. Attach what you promised
    We’ve all been there: “Attached you’ll find a copy of the most important proposal of my lifetime.” Off goes that message—and there’s nothing with it. You send a sheepish follow-up message and feel like a fool.

    We can’t improve your memory for you. We can only say “it happens” and pat you on the head. We can, however, point out tools that may help. Gmail, for example, has a Forgotten Attachment Detector available through Gmail Labs (click the green beaker icon at the top of Gmail to access). It looks for words like “attachment” or “attached” in your message and warns you before sending. Thunderbird has an add-on called Attachment Reminder that handles the job; a utility with the same name does the same for Outlook.

    15. Don’t open attachments or click links you aren’t expecting
    The number one way to get malware: Trust that an attachment sent to you is what the message claims. Even if it does look okay, it could be dangerous, since malware likes to play pretend. If anything looks even remotely incorrect, contact the “sender” first to be sure you know who actually sent it.

    Likewise, phishing scams that send you to Web pages you should not visit often look legit. That’s the whole point of them, after all. You have to think very carefully when you get a message from a bank, or PayPal, or any number of services. First, do you have an account there? Second, does the message actually refer to something you could have done? (Example: eBay phishers will tell you there’s a problem with your auction—but do you have an auction running?)

    16. Trim excess in replies
    When you reply to a message, usually the original is appended below what you said. That way the recipient(s) can refer back to what was sent originally. While handy, this can be a pain when you’re searching through e-mails later (your query will yield multiple hits because the same words are in so many messages). Worse, eventually a long conversation will have a thread that goes on for pages and pages.

    At some point, take the time to cut some of the messages below. Better yet, just copy the most relevant part and paste it in above what you’re typing. Use >>> in front of that section to indicate that it’s from a previous message. Your succinctness will be appreciated.

    17. NO ALL CAPS
    This might be the oldest bit of netiquette around, but it’s still important to point out to total newbies who shun the Shift key in favor of Caps Lock: TYPING IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS IS THE INTERNET EQUIVALENT OF SHOUTING.

    If you truly can’t handle mixed case, then go all lowercase. We’ll call that a “style choice.”

    18. Know your audience
    Multiple personalities are part of communication. You don’t talk to your parents the same way you talk to your best friend, right? Don’t believe you can write an e-mail the same way you talk, or text. Its 1 thng 2 typ ungrmmtclly whn thrs a 140-160 chrctr lmt. Let alone without vowels. It’s quite another when you have all the space you need. It helps to look smart when making a point.

    19. Don’t e-mail angry
    There are many things not to do when angry. Drink. Drive. Call your significant other, or your significant other’s parents. Sending textual communication of any sort when peeved is also a big no-no.

    There’s always a chance that a missive from the boss, human resources, coworkers, or even family members can rub you the wrong way, if not cause outright rage. Do more than count to ten: Remember that not everyone is a nuanced writer, and for some people terse and to-the-point is the only way they can be. Your feelings don’t enter into it—and they’re not being malicious. Consider the source. Take a few hours or even a day to reply. If time is of the essence, call or visit them in person instead. Face to face, what could be an ugly confrontation may be quickly diffused.

    Sending angry messages of complaint can be useful, but be constructive. We’re no strangers here at PCMag to being told we’re dunces, but we always pay more attention when the writer can articulate where we went wrong, rather than just calling us shills for Microsoft (or Apple or HP or Sony, depending on the story).

    20. Recall/Undo a sent message
    Sometimes you send an e-mail and see a typo just a moment too late. Or notice that you did a Reply All and didn’t mean to (we warned you). Pushing a button to cancel sending is not usually an option outside of corporate e-mail systems. But you can work around that.

    Gmail Labs, for example, now offers Undo Send. If you click that Undo link a few seconds after sending, the message won’t go out. But be warned: You get only 5 seconds.

    Microsoft Outlook can be set up to mimic this undo function as well, using a rule that defers sending by seconds or minutes. That way you have time to realize the mistake and go fix it first. You can set up the rule by going to Tools, then Rules and Alerts. Start a blank rule that will “Check messages after sending.” Click Next until you’re warned about the rule working on all messages—that’s what you want. The next screen should have an option to “defer delivery by a number of minutes.” Pick a number, click OK, then Next. Skip the exceptions, name the rule, and click Finish.

    With Thunderbird, you can go to the File menu of a message and select Send later (hit Ctrl-Shift-Enter). That puts the message in your Unsent folder until you’re absolutely sure it’s ready. Go to File and select Send unsent messages to shoot them off.

    21. Put rules to work on your inbox
    Having a wild inbox without rules is no party—it’s a sure way to organizational meltdown. No one likes to follow rules, but if your messages do you’ll be happier. They’ll end up in the right folders, with the right color-coding and status, and they’ll help you get things done. Microsoft has written up a basic tutorial for creating rules in Outlook. Thunderbird calls the feature “Message Filters” and eloquently explains how to use them. Most e-mail programs have a variation that you should put to work.

    22. Don’t e-mail what you can IM (or text, or Twitter)
    Not everything you want to say may actually be worthy of a full message. Take advantage of the fact those you want to reach may use an instant-messaging application or may be following you on Twitter. Use Meebo to sign in to every service you have simultaneously—even Facebook.

    Of course, SMS texting is the closest short-form equivalent to e-mail. I’d guess 99 percent of what is sent via SMS would be a waste of time in e-mail. Texts aren’t limited to phones anymore (though you can see our favorite texting phones here.) You can send an e-mail from a PC to a phone via SMS using the right format; you need only know the recipient’s number and phone network. (See “The Best Wireless Carrier Shortcuts” for details.) If you’ve got a Google Voices account, use it to send and receive texts from the Web site to anyone in your Google Contacts list.

    23. Declare “e-mail bankruptcy” once in a while
    The term e-mail bankruptcy refers to the “debt” you owe people sending you a message. In theory, you’re expected to respond to all messages, or at the very least read everything you get, right? Declaring bankruptcy gets you out of that debt.

    Responding to everyone is impossible for those who get a hundred or more messages a day. The only way to survive such a deluge is to prioritize and hope you don’t miss something. In e-mail, as in business, sometimes you just have to give in and accept that you can’t do it. Declaring e-mail bankruptcy may be the only hope for your sanity.

    That means one thing: Erase your inbox. Yes, select all and hit Delete, and you can pretend those messages never arrived. If you can live with that guilt, you’re golden. (And maybe ready for a change in jobs.) Let your coworkers, friends, and family know via your blog or Twitter or however you mass-communicate that if they expected a reply on something important, they should resend.

    24. Avoid confidential info
    MySpace and Facebook and other social networks display our lives. But if you send something in e-mail to a single friend you expect privacy, right? Sure. If you’re lucky.

    Nothing is private on the Internet. When you commit something to text—or worse, to pictures or videos—and send it out, you’ve created something that easily can be sent on again. There’s nothing to prevent pictures you send to a boyfriend from going straight to his online Facebook account, except the decency and care for your well-being you trust he has. You might believe in him now, but those pics will still be in his e-mail after your breakup. Same goes for spouses, business partners, and anyone else you might part ways with. Trust is nice, but thinking ahead might be safer.

    25. Create a useful signature
    Your signature (or sig) is the block of text at the end of your message that spells out who you are. Sigs can be as simple as a “Best, Eric” or as complicated as a replica of your business card, complete with links to a Google Map of your location, and more.

    What’s useful may be in the eye of the beholder, but at the very least include your full name (spelled correctly, so when a correspondent misspells it later you can justly complain), title or company, e-mail address, and phone number.

    Everything else—a Twitter or IM address, for example—is gravy. And some information is useless. Fax numbers? Snail mail addresses? Who uses that? Okay, there is a real world where an address is pertinent, I suppose. In which case try a utility like Texter to create multiple sigs, some with all info, some with limited info. Then insert the one that best fits on a message-by-message basis.

    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
    Did you know this: People in nudist colonies play volleyball more than any other sport. . . .Now you do!

    Tags: