• scissors
    March 20th, 2012EthelCurrent Affairs, Politics
    Listen with webreader

    family guy joe arpaio

    Is it just me? Or does Joe Arpaio look and act like Peter Griffin?

    Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who has a history of “investigating” and persecuting those who oppose him, criticize him, or fail to share his view as to how “things should be”, has renewed his campaign to prove that US President Obama’s purported birth certificate is a fraud and a sham.

    (Note: Arpaio has been under investigation by the US Federal Government pretty much ever since the outset of the Obama presidency – It’s been like two school-yard bullies pushing each other around!)

    For those unfamiliar with Arpaio, he is the (some would say) disgraced Sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona. Joe Arpaio, is generally known for his office’s purported rampant racial profiling against Latinos, but more recently for assembling a team of volunteer self-styled “investigators” to examine Obama’s birth certificate. Earlier this month, that team concluded that the birth certificate is a “forgery and fraud.”

    Throwing fuel on the fire, today, Florida Congressman Cliff Stearns called for credence to be given to birth certificate investigations (apparently making reference to Arpaio’s investigation), saying,“I think we are just going to hold in abeyance a final decision until we hear, you know, some of these people seem to have legitimate concerns, so I don’t think it is unreasonable just to see what they have to say,” Stearns said.

    (Not so long ago, Stearns actually accepted the fact that President Obama was born in the United States. In 2009, his office looked into the matter and concluded that there was “no reason to question  the President’s citizenship.” )

    Here’s how Arpaio’s claims were presented on a Phoenix television station:

    One of Arpaio’s most vocal critics, “The Phoenix New Times, (which has had numerous tussels with Arpaio over the years – see http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/arpaio) today posted on its blog:

    Joe Arpaio’s Birther Squad Strikes Again: Mailman Claims “Foreign” Barack Obama Chatted Him Up at the Ayers’ House

    ​Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s “birther” squad continues to add to the absolute embarrassment of an “investigation” that the sheriff has ordered in his name.

    Newman

    The former craziest mailman in America.

    This time around, Arpaio’s conspiracy-nut buddies have released a signed affidavit from a retired mailman claiming the legitimacy of the Bill Ayers aspect of the “birther” investigation released at the beginning of the month.

    Mailman Allen Hulton — who was only indentified as a “retired government employee” at the “birther” press conference — has taken an oath swearing that Ayers’ mother told him about a “foreign, black” student at her home, and that guy with the “unusual foreign sounding name” hinted to him some time in the ’90s that he had a “prearranged” presidency.

    Clearly, Hulton realized in 2008 that this was the one-and-only Barack Hussein Obama.

    Remember, this is just part of the evidence that Arpaio has taken in to call for a “bi-partisan congressional investigation,” as Arpaio actually thinks the president’s birth certificate is about as real as Dolly Parton’s chest.

    The mailman’s affidavit, which comes attached to documentation stating he spent 39 years with the post office, talks about his experiences delivering mail to the parents of Bill Ayers in Illinois during the ’80s and ’90s.

    Hulton never actually met Ayers, he says, but his father just so happened to speak “like a Marxist and talked about the class struggle between the rich and poor” while he was putting mail in his mailbox.

    Then some time in the “early 1990s,” Mary Ayers — Bill Ayers’ mother — said she was “impressed with a foreign, black student.”

    “I do not recall from what country she said he was,” the affidavit says. “I recall that the student had an unusual, foreign sounding name. Mary stated Thomas Ayers was helping this student through school financially.”

    Some time after that — “I am not sure of the exact period of time,” he says — Hulton claims a black guy with an “unusual, foreign sounding name” introduced himself.

    “He stated during the conversation the male stated that he was ‘going to be’ President
    of the United States,” Hulton swears. “I was taken aback by this statement because he came across as if his presidency was prearranged.”

    By 2008, the friendly postman who spoke with the neighborhood “Marxist” and chatted up foreigners made his discovery.

    “During the 2008 presidential campaign, Isaw several news reports detailing a relationship between candidate Barack Obama and radical activist Bill Ayers,” Hulton says.”These stories reminded me of my conversations with the Ayers and my encounter with the young black male with the foreign sounding name. The facial and physical characteristics, as well as candidate Obama’s voice, matched that of the young black male I met at the Ayers’ home. Iam positive that the black male I spoke with in front of the Ayers house that day was indeed a young Barack Obama.”

    Just like the rest of the “birther” squad’s evidence, it’s recycled from stuff that’s been passed around like tinfoil at a conspiracy-theorist conference, but Arpaio’s pals at the World Net Daily says it’s officially been submitted to Arpaio’s “Cold Case Posse.”

    While the affidavit just claims Obama was “foreign,” the mailman tells Arpaio’s pals, “… I believe [Mary Ayers] said he was from either Kenya or Indonesia, and I favor Indonesia in my recollection.”

    Looks like the sheriff’s boys are building a real quality case over there. Click here for the sworn affidavit.

    separator

    (Ethel: Come on, “New Times” . . . don’t beat around the bush . . . tell us what you really think about Arpaio and his “investigation”)

    Does anyone know what would happen if it were actually proved that Obama’s birth certificate is a fraud and that he was not born in the USA? Would he immediately be removed from office and (God forbid!) VP Joe Biden would become President? Or would the Presidency be taken away from Obama and given to  John McCain, his “runner up” in the last election? Would Obama be permitted to serve out his current term, but be prohibited from running again?

    Maybe Obama is an illegal alien and should be deported to Kenya or Indonesia or somewhere? I bet that’s what Joe would say!

    As always, your comments are encouraged.

      Tags: , , ,
    • scissors
      August 16th, 2011EthelCanada
      Listen with webreader

      My loyal readers will have noticed that my posts have been few and far between, lately. I apologize; however, I am pleased to say that I have been on vacation in Canada.

      I began in Winnipeg, Manitoba – where I was fortunate enough to catch a performance of the play “To My Amazement”, at a theatre festival held annually there. The play was written, directed, produced, and performed by some very good friends of mine from Costa Rica. It was wonderful.

      I have since moved on to the neighboring province of Saskatchewan – more about that in my next post – and, on Saturday, I will be moving another province over, to Alberta.

      What I have found most interesting during my vacation in Western Canada is that there is no “doom and gloom” attitude like there is in the United States. The economy seems to be very healthy, there is very little unemployment, and the people appear to be prosperous and happy.

      Maclean’s Magazine recently ran an interesting article explaining why it’s the best time of all to be a Canadian.

      The magazine’s Web site counterpart, Macleans.ca, published a similar article claiming that Canadians are now the ones living “the American Dream”, which is now escaping the grasp of the average American.
      Macleans

      To be an American is to be the best. Every American believes this. Their sports champions are not U.S. champions, they’re world champions. Their corporations aren’t the largest in the States, they’re the largest on the planet. Their armies don’t defend just America, they defend freedom.

      Like the perpetual little brother, Canadians have always lived in the shadow of our American neighbours. We mock them for their uncultured ways, their brash talk and their insularity, but it’s always been the thin laughter of the insecure. After all, says University of Lethbridge sociologist Reginald Bibby, a leading tracker of social trends, “Americans grow up with the sincere belief that their nation is a nation that is unique and special, literally called by something greater to be blessed and to be a blessing to people around the globe.” Canadians can’t compete with that.

      But it turns out that while they’ve been out conquering the world, here in Canada we’ve been quietly working away at building better lives. While they’ve been pursuing happiness, we’ve been achieving it.

      How do we know? You just have to look at the numbers. For our Canada Day special issue this year, Maclean’s compared Canadians and Americans in every facet of our lives. We scoured census reports, polls, surveys, scientific studies, policy papers and consumer databases. We looked at who lives longer, who works more, who spends more time with friends, who travels more and who has more sex. We even found out who eats more vegetables. After digging through the data, here’s what we found: the staid, underpaid Canadian is dead. Believe it or not, we now have more wealth than Americans, even though we work shorter hours. We drink more often, but we live longer and have fewer diseases. We have more sex, more sex partners and we’re more adventurous in bed, but we have fewer teen pregnancies and fewer sexually transmitted diseases. We spend more time with family and friends, and more time exploring the world. Even in crime we come out ahead: we’re just as prone to break the law, but when we do it, we don’t get shot. Most of the time, we don’t even go to jail.

      The data shows that it’s the Canadians who are living it up, while Americans toil away, working longer hours to pay their mounting bills.

      The wealth numbers, in particular, are shocking. As of 2005, the median family in Canada was worth US$122,600, according to Statistics Canada, while the U.S. Federal Reserve pegged the median American family at US$93,100 in 2004. Those figures, the most recent available, already include an adjustment for our higher prices, and thanks to the rising loonie Canadians are likely even further ahead today. We’re ahead mainly because Americans carry far more debt than we do, and it means that the median Canadian family is a full 30 per cent wealthier than the median American family. “The fact that we’re now richer is a big reversal,” says Jack Mintz, former president of the C.D. Howe Institute and the current Palmer Chair in public policy at the University of Calgary. “It’s a huge change in the way we view the world.”

      Mintz points out that it wasn’t all that long ago that we were much poorer than the Americans. Just think back to the 1980s when our dollar was worth 69 American cents, inflation was raging, our real wages were dropping and our productivity was . . . well it was just embarrassing. “From 1987 to 1997 in particular, we had terrible economic growth,” says Mintz. “By the time we reached 1999, we were way behind the U.S. in per capita incomes and everything else.” Back then, he notes, the newspapers were packed with dire warnings of brain drain. Canadian incomes were so low compared to Americans, our best and brightest were fleeing the country.

      Today, it’s the reverse, and families such as Eric Nay, his wife, Polly, and their son are moving the other way. Nay, who’s 41 and now works as associate dean at the Ontario College of Art & Design in Toronto, says he packed his bags and left his home in tony Monterey, Calif., for a new life in Canada two years ago. And get this: he did it for a bigger paycheque. “The academic salaries here are much higher,” he says. “When I was working as an assistant professor in California, I was making $55,000, but in Canada, that magically becomes $70,000.”

      How did this happen? Canada often comes out ahead when you look at squishy things like quality of life. But since when were we richer? Mintz credits the rising loonie, the boom in commodities, and better public policy. He says that over the past decade productivity growth in the U.S. has slowed, while we’ve been hacking away at our government debt and lowering taxes. In short, as a nation, we’ve been doing everything right, while the U.S. has been doing everything wrong.

      When you look at how individual Canadian and American families make and spend their money, it gets even more interesting. The numbers show that our median household incomes are about the same, or at least they were back in 2005 when the most recent figures came out. That year the median household income in Canada was about US$44,300, after you adjust it for the exchange rate and our lower purchasing power, while the American median was US$46,300. Since then, the loonie has gained on the U.S. dollar, so we’ve likely narrowed the gap. But while our incomes may be similar to American incomes, we’re still much wealthier because we have less debt. What you make isn’t a good measure of how rich you are — to figure out your true wealth you should add up everything you have and subtract what you owe. And Americans owe more. A lot more. Here in Canada the average amount of personal debt per person is US$23,460. In the U.S. it’s a whopping US$40,250. And all those numbers are from 2005, just before their housing market slipped into a sinkhole. If you looked at the numbers now, you’d find that Americans are even further behind, because their largest asset — their home — is worth less. “There has been a lot of destruction of wealth in the U.S. over the past few years,” says Mintz, “and that would affect the net worth figures significantly. I would suspect that they would be even worse off today.”

      Certainly Canadians who venture down to live in the U.S. say there’s a huge difference in how the two countries approach spending and debt. Gerry Van Boven grew up in southern Ontario but moved to the U.S. in 1985. Now he’s 57 and living in Fort Lauderdale, Fla. He says his American friends seem genuinely puzzled by his reluctance to load on huge piles of debt so he can buy a big luxury car and a monster home. “Most of the people that I know who were born and raised here are a lot farther in hock than I am, and they think that’s quite normal,” he says. “They’re like, ‘Can’t afford it? I’ll just put it on plastic.’ Whereas I was brought up to believe that if you can’t afford to buy it in cash, you can’t afford it.”

      The numbers confirm that Americans like to spend big. They have bigger homes than we do, averaging about 2,500 sq. feet, compared to only 2,000 sq. feet in Canada. They spend about 34 per cent of their annual household expenditure on their homes, compared to just 19 per cent here. They also love big cars. In the U.S., luxury cars and SUVs make up 21 per cent of the market, whereas in Canada, they make up only 11 per cent. The most popular model overall in the U.S. is the more upscale Toyota Camry, whereas we prefer the basic Honda Civic. “They like the big SUVs here especially,” says Van Boven, “or at least they did. A good friend of mine went out and bought one of those big GMC Yukons a while back, but now gas is at $4 a gallon. I saw him the other day and asked when he was going to get rid of it. ‘I can’t,’ he said. ‘I don’t own it yet.’ ”

      Bibby, the sociologist, says the great American debt load is a direct result of their relentless quest for the best. “American culture is more consumer-oriented due to a more intense and more vigorous marketplace,” he says. “My sense is that more dollars are spent per capita on advertising, for example. Little wonder then that per capita debt is considerably higher in the U.S. than in Canada. It is largely a function of the aggressive and successful marketing efforts of American companies.” Health care, too, is helping to keep Americans in a state of owe, and for all the same reasons. In the U.S., as long as you have a good insurance plan, you have access to the best health care in the world. MRI machines are available on an hour’s notice, there’s plenty of staff, and the specialists are the finest there are. But all of that comes at a cost, says Van Boven, and every American feels it. “The absolute biggest difference, financially, that I noticed was the cost of health insurance,” he says. “When my wife got laid off, we found out that you could keep the insurance you got through work for a while as long as you paid for it. But it cost $5,000 a year, and that was back in 1986. We couldn’t afford that. So since then I’ve had no health insurance.” Eric Nay, who moved to Toronto from California, says that even Americans with good insurance feel the pinch. “When I taught for the state of California, I had the best health coverage on the planet,” he reports. “But when my son was born — and it was totally by the book, no complications — my insurance only covered the first $10,000 of the hospital costs. The remaining $8,000 came out of my pocket. And that’s with full coverage.”

      Meanwhile in Canada, not only are we wealthier, but we don’t even have to work as hard to make that wealth. In 2004, the average Canadian worker put in 35 hours of work per week, while our American counterparts put in 38. Only 30 per cent of Canadians work 45 hours a week or more, compared to 38 per cent of Americans. We also get — and take — much more vacation time. Employed adults in Canada get about 17 vacation days a year, and we take 16 of those days, leaving just one on the table. In the U.S., they get 14 days of vacation, but they only take 11, making them the world leader in yet another category: the working drudge.

      Because we have more time off, Canadians tend to have a lot more fun. We spend more time with friends than Americans do, and we’re much more likely to have a sit-down dinner with the family at home each night. We also tend to drink alcohol more often, with 27 per cent of us having a drink at least a few times a week, compared to 19 per cent of Americans. Nay says that our richer social lives were one of the biggest differences he noticed when he moved to Toronto. “It was only in Canada that I found myself going to the pub with friends and colleagues,” he says. “I spend more time in pubs here than I have in any other place that I’ve lived. It’s partly the culture, and partly because the quality of beer is fantastic.”

      Christian Lander is another Canadian living among Americans. He grew up in Toronto, but the 29-year-old moved to Los Angeles 2½ years ago where he runs the popular Stuff White People Like website, and he’s publishing a book under the same name on July 1. He also finds that Americans like to do things big, but that doesn’t always mean better. “The expectations here are just different,” he says. “There’s more ambition. More ambition to acquire more in terms of money and career. Whereas Canadians seem to be more European in that we care more about enjoying life.” He’s lived all over the country and says that it’s very difficult to sum up the differences between Americans and Canadians because Americans are so diverse. The gaps between rich and poor, or black and white within the confines of the U.S. are much deeper and wider than the gap between the two countries. And within that mix, he says there’s a subset of Americans who are just like Canadians. “Left-wing urban Americans,” he says. “Canada is just a country of left-wing urban Americans.” Still, he says that the relentless zeal, the private schools, the long work hours, not to mention the fact that everyone in L.A. seems to carry a gun, well, it all gets him down sometimes. His wife, who’s American, is pushing to move back to Toronto, he says. “And yeah, we probably will.”

      Reginald Bibby notes the irony of the situation. The U.S. is a country that aggressively pursues happiness, but Canada seems to have just stumbled onto it. While Americans are putting in overtime to pursue the American dream, we’re at the pub having a few pints with friends. They may have bigger cars and bigger homes, but they’re living under a mountain of debt. They look richer, but the numbers prove that they’re not. The truth is that all of that competition, all of that keeping up with the Joneses, can take its toll. Getting ahead can be a lot easier when everyone is moving in the same direction. “The pursuit of happiness is ingrained in Americans as part of what it means to be an American,” Bibby says. “But in Canada, happiness is almost something of a by-product of coexisting peacefully.”

      Be it sports, health care, business or wealth, Americans are still competing to be the best. And it’s true that the best in the U.S. is the best you’ll find on the planet. But when you look at the medians and the averages, their accomplishment pales. As the hard numbers in this report show, Americans have shorter lives, poorer health, less sex, more divorces, and more violent crime. Which may mean that perhaps America isn’t the greatest nation on earth. After all, you can’t judge a nation by the best it produces, you have to judge it by the success of the average Joe. And the average Joe in Canada is having a way better time.

      Very interesting, eh!


      Check out these related blogs

        Tags: , ,
      • scissors
        March 23rd, 2011EthelCurrent Affairs, Politics
        Listen with webreader

        As you all know, US President Obama initiated a military attack on Libya, without Congressional approval (or even consultation).

        This video speaks for itself:

        Directions: Open Mouth. Insert Foot.


        Check out these related blogs

        Tags: ,
      • scissors
        December 11th, 2010EthelCurrent Affairs, Humor, Politics
        Listen with webreader

        headlinesThe economy is so bad  that . . .

        . . . I got a pre-declined credit card in the mail.

        . . . I  ordered a burger at McDonald’s, and the kid behind the counter  asked,  “Can you afford fries with that?”

        . . . CEO’s are now playing miniature golf.

        . . . If the bank returns your check marked “Insufficient Funds,” you have to call them and ask if they mean you or them.

        . . . Hot Wheels and Matchbox stocks are trading higher than General Motors.

        . . . McDonald’s is selling  the 1/4  ‘ouncer’.

        . . . Parents in  Beverly Hills and Malibu are firing their nannies and learning their  children’s names.

        . . . A truckload of  Americans was caught sneaking into Mexico .

        . . . Dick Cheney took his  stockbroker hunting.

        . . . Motel Six won’t leave the light on anymore.

        . . . The Mafia is laying off judges.

        . . . BP Oil laid off 25 Congressmen.

        Bad Economy


        Check out these related blogs

        Tags: ,
      • scissors
        Listen with webreader

        To all my friends in the USA, I wish you a very Happy Repeal Day!

        Prohibition EndsProhibition in the United States, also known as The Noble Experiment, was the period from 1920 to 1933, during which the sale, manufacture, and transportation of alcohol were banned nationally as mandated in the Eighteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

        Under substantial pressure from the temperance movement, the United States Senate proposed the Eighteenth Amendment on December 18, 1917. Having been approved by 36 states, the 18th Amendment was ratified on January 16, 1919 and effected on January 16, 1920. Some state legislatures had already enacted statewide prohibition prior to the ratification of the 18th Amendment.

        The “Volstead Act”, the popular name for the National Prohibition Act, passed through Congress over President Woodrow Wilson’s veto on October 28, 1919, and established the legal definition of intoxicating liquor, as well as penalties for producing it. Though the Volstead Act prohibited the sale of alcohol, the federal government did little to enforce it. By 1925, in New York City alone, there were anywhere from 30,000 to 100,000 speakeasy clubs.

        While Prohibition was successful in reducing the amount of liquor consumed, it tended to undermine society by other means, as it stimulated the proliferation of rampant underground, organized and widespread criminal activity. (This downside to Prohibition provides one of the dominant arguments for current proponents of the legalization of marijuana).

        Prohibition became increasingly unpopular during the Great Depression, especially in large cities. The bulk of America became disenchanted after the St. Valentine’s Day massacre in 1929.

        On March 22, 1933, President Franklin Roosevelt signed into law an amendment to the Volstead Act known as the Cullen-Harrison Act, allowing the manufacture and sale of certain kinds of alcoholic beverages.

        On December 5, 1933, the ratification of the Twenty-first Amendment repealed the Eighteenth Amendment.

        Prohibition greatly enhanced the Canadian (particularly the Ontario) economy, as a result of smuggling booze across the Detroit River and the Great Lakes, and it made some Canadians (such as the Bronfman family) very wealthy.

        SeagramsSamuel Bronfman was born on February 27, 1889, in Soroki, Bessarabia, while his family was en route from Russia to Canada. As a young man, he worked in the family’s hotel business in Manitoba. In 1924, Samuel Bronfman built his first distillery in Montreal, and in 1928, the Montreal company merged with Joseph E. Seagram & Sons of Waterloo (Distillers Corporation-Seagrams Ltd.).

        Bronfman’s keen market sense led to the worldwide success of what became The Seagram Company Ltd. For example, in 1933 when prohibition ended in the United States, his company was prepared with huge amounts of aged and carefully blended whiskies, as well as its own U.S. distribution network. Seagram’s Seven Crown American Whiskey and V.O. Canadian Whisky soon became the best-selling brands in the world.

        Check out these related blogs

        Tags: , , ,
      • scissors
        November 11th, 2010EthelCurrent Affairs, Politics
        Listen with webreader

        I thought that using US taxpayers’ money to pay for grief counselors for soon-to-be unemployed Democrat staffers was ridiculous. (See yesterday’s post).

        Get this:

        Members of a key panel created by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, better known as the stimulus bill, have scheduled a meeting on November 22 to consider ways to prevent “fraud, waste, and abuse of Recovery Act funds.”

        Ritz Carlton Phoenix

        . . . and where is the meeting going to be held?

        The participants will all be flown (first class, no doubt) to Phoenix, Arizona (where the weather is much nicer in November than it is in D.C.)  The meeting will be held at the super-luxe Ritz Carlton Hotel.

        The group is the Recovery Independent Advisory Panel, a sub-committee of the larger Recovery Accountability and Transparency board (sometimes known as “the RAT board”).

        The stimulus bill set up the Recovery Independent Advisory Panel, or RIAP, to make recommendations to identify and prevent waste of the bill’s $814 billion in stimulus spending.

        “The purpose of the November 22, 2010 meeting is to allow the RIAP to have an open dialogue, with input from the public, on issues relating to fraud, waste, and abuse of Recovery Act funds,” says a notice in the Federal Register.

        Specifically, participants in the meeting will discuss various techniques to detect and prevent fraud, waste, and abuse, as well as larger issues of transparency and public awareness.

        The Ritz-Carlton is located “in the midst of the picturesque Camelback Corridor, the city’s premier shopping, dining and financial district,” according the hotel’s website. The “corporate rate” for rooms range from $229 to $359 per night.

        Hungry waste-and-abuse hunters can dine in the “casual elegance, relaxed atmosphere and uniquely inviting ambiance of the European-inspired bistro 24.” Or they can enjoy Afternoon Tea in the “uniquely warm and inviting” Lobby Lounge.

        . . . or the participants can contemplate “waste and abuse” as they dine or shop at the upscale Biltmore Fashion Park, directly across Camelback Road from the hotel.

        And at any time, waste-and-abuse watchdogs who also enjoy golf will be “just minutes from some of the best courses in the world,” including the Tournament Players Club, the Arizona Biltmore, and several others.

        Did the irony of all of this never occur to anyone involved? One wonders if the “RAT Board” could sniff out “waste and abuse” even if it were served up to them on fine china at bistro 24.

        (And of course, there’s one other interesting element to the story: The board is holding a meeting in Arizona, home of the immigration law that President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder have condemned and are challenging in court, and a state that is also the target of boycotts by a number of left-leaning groups and local governments around the country).


        Check out these related blogs

        Tags:
      • scissors
        November 10th, 2010EthelCurrent Affairs, Politics
        Listen with webreader

        You’ve got to be kidding!

        What Democrat staffer riding a wave of “Hope & Change” into Capitol Hill after the 2008 election would have guessed that a mere two years later they’d need to be offered access to grief counselors?

        According to Politico:

        A staffer for a congressional Democrat who came up short on Tuesday reports that a team of about five people stopped by their offices this morning to talk about payroll, benefits, writing a résumé, and so forth, with staffers who are now job hunting.

        But one of the staffers was described as a “counselor” to help with the emotional aspect of the loss — and a section in the packet each staffer was given dealt with the stages of grief (for instance, Stage One being anger, and so on).
        [...]
        While Tuesday was definitely a major loss for the Democrats, I hadn’t heard it cast in a stages-of-grief way before.

        Writing for MichelleMalkin.com, Doug Powers said:

        Doug Powers

        Doug Powers

        Compounding the disappointment of finding themselves out of work must be the frightening prospect of being stuck in a health care system their bosses just lost their jobs for passing.

        The five stages of Democrat grief — a current political offshoot of the Kübler-Ross model — that are being worked through at various levels in DC are as follows:

        1) Blame Bush

        2) Anger (Why didn’t those idiotic voters understand our message?)

        3) Bargaining (From “I won” to “okay, maybe we can work things out between us”)

        4) Depression (The country is on the brink of a depression; see #1)

        5) Acceptance (Yes, it was Bush’s fault)

        grief counselorHow nice that the US government (taxpayer) is providing counselors for the unfortunate staffers who will be without a job (big salary, great benefits, etc.) now that their bosses lost the recent mid-term election.

        My question is, “Where are the grief counselors for the hundreds of thousands of Americans that have been, continue to be, or soon will be, unemployed due to the actions (or inactions) of that same US government.”

        Check out these related blogs

        Tags:
      • scissors
        August 18th, 2010EthelCurrent Affairs, Games, Politics
        Listen with webreader

        Greetings.  I apologize for the lack of postings to this blog by Ethel the Frog.  I made the mistake of giving her a vacation . . . I understand that that the old hag is laying on Orient Beach in St. Martin (naked, no doubt . . . oh, I just threw up in my mouth picturing that).

        I haven’t heard from her, so I’m sure she’s getting pickled every day . . . and enjoying her vacation.

        In her absence, I will post some things that have been on my mind of late.

        Those of you who read this blog know that I have been a big Obama supporter (even though I am not a USA citizen or even a resident).

        However, lately, I have started to question my faith in the man’s integrity.  He seems to have no qualms about saying whatever suits him at the time, even if it’s an outright lie.  That’ s not good.

        For example, President Obama recently stated that his father served in World War II.

        Take a look:

        Now, I watched an episode of “Family Guy” wherein Stewie Griffin enrolled in the U.S.Army as an infant . . . but I’m pretty sure that didn’t really happen.

        It was September 1st, 1939 when Nazi Germany first invaded Poland.  Obama’s father would have been three-years-old at the time!  When WWII ended, Obama’s old man would have been a geezer of about nine-years old.

        Facts truly are stubborn things.  Perhaps what’s most interesting about the verbal ‘misstep’ is the ease and sincerity at which Obama pulls it off.  Kinda makes you wonder what else he might be lying about . . .

        Let’s look at another video (believe me, there are lots of them . . . just do a search on YouTube using the terms “Obama lies”, “Obama deception”, etc.):

        Okay, to lighten things up, I want to introduce you to a great comedian named Steve Bridges, who does an amazing Obama impersonation (as well as George Bush, Bill Clinton, etc.):

        Part One:

        Part Two:

        Okay . . . now on a more somber, but not necessarily unrelated topic . . . the game developer Kaos Studios and publisher THQ is coming out with an new game for the Xbox 360, called “Homefront”.

        Now, I’ve often said that Americans are naive when they think that the USA will forever be the Super Power of the world.  That’s what the Ottoman Empire, the Roman Empire, the British Empire, etc. all thought, as well.

        The premise of “Homefront” is that, 15 years from now, Korea will occupy the U.S.A.

        Far-fetched?

        The game developer hired Tae Kim, formerly with the CIA, to explain a timeline that might lead us to the premise of the game:

        2012: Kim Jong II dies, and his son succeeds him as leader of North Korea.

        2013: The new, charismatic young leader united North and South Korean, forming the Greater Korea Republic.

        2015: The U.S. suffers another economic recession, giving rise to skyrocketing gasoline prices and civil unrest.

        2017: Exploiting its newfound unity and growing military, the GKR threatens Japan with annihilation.  Japan surrenders.

        2018: The GKR begins bolstering their military presence with Japan’s technology and supply of nuke-making plutonium.

        2021: A new strain of flu virus kills millions of Americans.

        2022: Disguised as a gesture of peace, the GKR launches a satellite that cripples the United States’ electronic infrastructure with an EMP.  A more direct cyber-attack on the military soon follows.

        2025: Taking advantage of the U.S.’s weakened state, the GKR employs a Trojan Horse tactic – delivering thousands of troops disguised as US Nationals in shipping containers to the American shores – to overtake Hawaii.  From there, they separate North America’s West and East by radiating the Mississippi River. and begin occupying San Francisco.

        And so on . . .

        Again, far-fetched?  Hmmm.


        Check out these related blogs

        Tags: , , , ,
      • scissors
        July 4th, 2010EthelCurrent Affairs
        Listen with webreader

        Happy Fourth of July to all my American family and friends!


        Check out these related blogs

        Tags:
      • scissors
        May 28th, 2010EthelCurrent Affairs, Politics
        Listen with webreader

        In my last post, I included an excerpt from a call-in radio talk show featuring a caller who believed that the US borders should be open and anyone, from anywhere in the world, should have the unfettered right to go to the United States.  (She also said that she was on welfare, but didn’t think that the taxpayers paid for her welfare . . . instead, the money came from “Obama”.  When asked where he got the money, she said she didn’t know . . . maybe his “stash”.  Then she suggested that it was the illegal aliens who worked and then gave the money to the government).

        It is truly unfortunate for the institution of democracy that too many people are as stupid as this woman.

        Anyway, putting aside the issue of Obama’s “stash” and getting back to open borders, I was surprised to discover that many people believe that President Obama is working towards a “Global Governance” – a “one world government”.  Apparently, the overall plan of the political left is to be rid of both the US/Mexican border and the US/Canadian  border.  With a one-world government there will be no borders.  None will be needed.

        That, according to proponents of this theory, is why Obama and the far left are making such a fuss about Arizona’s immigration law (even though many of them admit to not reading it, and even though it is less susceptible to abuse than the corresponding federal law).

        According to J.D. Longstreet, writing for Faultline USA:

        Arizona just spat in the faces of the political left all over the world. And they are seriously PO’ed!

        J.D. Longstreet

        Look, even a fool knows the US government could close, seal, and secure the borders — if it wanted to. The simple truth is — the American government does not want to secure her borders. The progressives in the US government have been working for decades to pave the way for global governance, which would include the US. A global government would override the US Constitution, making it null and void.  The same group has been working feverishly to destroy the US Constitution of 1787 by claiming it is a “living document” and crying out for a new US Constitution for the 21st century.

        Understand: the proposed global government would be a socialist/marxist/communist government. The socialist Obama Regime (which actually believes it is running the country), the socialist Congress — including both the US House and the US Senate, were necessary to move the progressive agenda for global governance to fruition.  The so-called “Shadow Government” now has control of the Executive and the Legislative branches of the US Government and it is closing in on control of the third branch of our government – the Judicial branch.

        Anything that gets in the way of the socialist/progressives must be crushed.

        I give you: The Political Left’s War on Arizona!

        (I wonder how Costa Rica fits into this proposed socialist/marxist/communist global government?)

        As for Arizona, apparently it is not beyond the realm of possibility that it could secede from the  Union. So says Mr. Longstreet, as well as Marc Chung and Will Bunch (The Huffington Post).  Indeed, Arizona already has a bill (HCR 2034) which specifically provides for abolishment of the federal government and for state sovereignty.  Apparently, other states could follow Arizona.

        I remember a novel entitled “The Last Days of America” . . . maybe we’re living in those days right now.

        I personally doubt that we’re going to see a socialist/marxist/communist global government any time soon, or that Arizona will secede and go it on it’s own  . . . but, then again, I’m pretty bad at predicting the future.

        Comments?

        Check out these related blogs

        Tags: , ,
      • « Older Entries